In ten years, the number of cases brought before the administrative judge has increased by 96% before the administrative courts and by 164% before the administrative courts of appeal.
Joined the traditional areas of administrative litigation such as taxes, administrative contracts, civil service, civil liberties, administrative police, litigation related to the environmental policy of the company, litigation related to the protection of with regard to nominative processing of digital data or disputes related to the increasing intervention of independent administrative authorities for economic regulation.
It is in this context that HIRO has developed its litigation practice before administrative courts for its business clients who are now overwhelmed by administrative regulations depending on their field of activity and the regulations to which they are subject due to the multiplication of public authorities and the renewal of public policies.
This specific litigation practice allows the partners of the HIRO firm to lodge appeals before the administrative courts in order to annul regulatory acts, administrative decisions that would be considered as not in accordance with national or supra-national law (lodging of appeals for excess of power, summary suspension, etc.).
The HIRO firm understands all of the new economic and social regulations (public services, networks of general interest, economic freedoms, public aid, etc.). Innervated by the written word, this litigation practice allows the firm's clients to be proactive in the management of administrative rules that limit their activities and frame their development and support them in the context of State liability actions.